Out of bounds should cost out of pocket
Jan 10, 2013 | 1958 views | 1 1 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
To the Editor:

After reading your recent brief about skiers needing to be rescued from off-trail areas (“Skiers Lost in the Woods,” DVN, January 3, 2013), I must comment on the atrocity and risk that Messrs, Barbarossa, Dipietro, Castro, Consoni, and Massard brought upon themselves and their rescuers (state police SAR team, Killington ski patrol, and Killington fire department and SAR team) in their ski escapades over the past weekend.

By way of background, I have spent a lot of my life in wilderness areas “off trail” and “out of bounds,” in activities with Boy Scouts, Outward Bound, the army, at sea, and a large part of my leisure and retirement activities, including a current effort to summit all 48 four-thousand-footers of the White Mountains. I know the desire to go “out of bounds,” and I know its concomitant responsibility. I have on each such trip been prepared to meet that responsibility. The men cited in the article admittedly breached their responsibility – they violated the rules of the ski areas prescribed on their lift tickets (“skied into the woods off the … ski trail,” “leaving the ski trail,” “skiing out of bounds”), they probably trespassed onto private property, they put themselves and minors at risk, and they subjected rescue personnel to risk and expense.

In my view, those adult men should be cited, charged with the expenses incurred by the rescuing parties, and fined for the breaches of the ski area policy. Otherwise, future recreationists with similar lacks of good judgment will continue with similar and increasingly emboldened dangerous transgressions because they believe they will be rescued with no penalty.

Raymond S. Munn

Comments-icon Post a Comment
January 11, 2013
I agree completely with Raymond S. Munn.