Should Vermont Yankee continue operating?
Jan 03, 2013 | 2251 views | 0 0 comments | 3 3 recommendations | email to a friend | print
To the Editor:

The Public Service Board is holding hearings around Vermont seeking input for their docket on whether or not to grant Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant a new certificate of public good to continue operating. PSB should deny VY a new CPG for the following reasons.

We cannot count on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to look out for our public good. Historically it has proven to be (1) of the nuclear industry; (2) by the nuclear industry; and (3) for the nuclear industry.

Nor can we count on VY’s parent, Louisiana-based Entergy, to look out for our public good. Entergy’s “fiduciary responsibility” is to make decisions that benefit their shareholders. This has meant deferring maintenance, postponing major equipment replacements, and ignoring the rising but impending costs of decommissioning. Entergy subsequently filed suits against the state of Vermont and the Public Service Board to try to reverse a decision they had previously agreed to and demanding that Vermont taxpayers cover their legal fees.

We cannot count on Vermont Yankee to enhance our public good since they have not even proposed a competitive energy price acceptable to our utilities.

We have counted on the Vermont Legislature, and the Vermont Senate examined closely Entergy’s corporate record. The Senate deemed that record was not conducive to the public good and, reflecting the expressed will of the majority of Vermonters, voted to reject PSB approval of a Certificate of Public Good for VY.

We could not count on the courts to look out for Vermont’s public good. Federal judge Gavin Murtha’s pro-VY decision in the case Entergy brought against the state was based on inference – what Entergy said the legislators were thinking when they voted – rather than on the written legislative record. Murtha’s decision is being appealed, but meanwhile Murtha returned the CPG decision back to the PSB; hence, the PSB docket and public hearings.

I ask the PSB to value the constitutional concept of states’ rights and respect the Vermont legislative decisions; examine the history of Entergy’s corporate behavior; and following the precepts of its own mission statement deny Vermont Yankee a new certificate of public good.

Betsy Eldredge
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet

Comment Policy

In an effort to promote reasoned discussion, transparency, and integrity in online commenting, The Deerfield Valley News requires anyone posting comments to identify themselves using their real name. Anonymous commenting will not be allowed. All comments will be subject to approval before posting, and may take up to 24 hours for approval to be granted.

We encourage civil discourse among readers, and ask that they be willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. No personal harassment or hate speech will be tolerated. Please be succinct and to the point. For longer comments, please consider submitting a letter to the editor instead. It will appear in both the print and online editions.

All comments will be reviewed, and we reserve the right to reject, edit or remove any comment for any reason. For questions or to express concerns feel free to contact our office at (802) 464-3388.