Urges legislature to consider bottle bill
Jan 24, 2013 | 1417 views | 0 0 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
To the Editor:

The Vermont Bicycle and Pedestrian Coalition is just that: a coalition. We believe that Vermonters are interested in supporting bicycling and walking for many diverse reasons. The same is true for recycling, and in particular the bottle bill– people can view it from many different perspectives, and still find something worth preserving and expanding.

In one respect, cyclists have a special familiarity with the impact of the bottle bill; roadside litter affects our safety. You would be hard pressed to find a regular cyclist who had never gotten a flat tire from a stray piece of glass on a road, sidewalk, or shoulder. And perhaps more important than flat tires, a cyclist trying to navigate a narrow corridor between a curb and automobile traffic faces a difficult decision when coming suddenly upon a broken bottle in their path. Swerving, stopping short, or riding through: there are no good options.

Vermont’s bottle bill has coincided with a reduction in litter by more than a third in the last four decades, representing many difficult and dangerous cycling situations that never had to happen.

We all can agree that anything that increases recycling rates is good for all of us in terms of reducing energy use and reducing climate change impacts.

But we hope we as cyclists can bring awareness of one more reason to support keeping and expanding the bottle bill. We encourage the legislature, and the Agency of Natural Resources, to consider the many benefits the bottle bill provides to Vermont.


Nancy Schulz

Executive director, Vermont Bicycle & Pedestrian Coalition

Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet

Comment Policy

In an effort to promote reasoned discussion, transparency, and integrity in online commenting, The Deerfield Valley News requires anyone posting comments to identify themselves using their real name. Anonymous commenting will not be allowed. All comments will be subject to approval before posting, and may take up to 24 hours for approval to be granted.

We encourage civil discourse among readers, and ask that they be willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. No personal harassment or hate speech will be tolerated. Please be succinct and to the point. For longer comments, please consider submitting a letter to the editor instead. It will appear in both the print and online editions.

All comments will be reviewed, and we reserve the right to reject, edit or remove any comment for any reason. For questions or to express concerns feel free to contact our office at (802) 464-3388.