Concerned about budget veto
Jun 29, 2017 | 563 views | 0 0 comments | 88 88 recommendations | email to a friend | print
To the Editor,

I write as the Executive Director of the Community of Vermont Elders, an organization that has represented older Vermonters’ interests on the state level for more than three decades. Given the economic realities of today, many older Vermonters struggle to live lives with dignity and respect in which their basic needs are met and they have an opportunity to enjoy the later part of their lives.

Older Vermonters, especially those who are more economically challenged, were heartened by the budget the Legislature passed this session. The budget includes a 2% increase in funding for such home and community based long-term care services as Meals on Wheels, home health, adult day services, and area agencies on aging; expansion of LIHEAP, the federal fuel assistance program; and significant pay increases for workers at Vermont’s community mental health agencies, a long-underfunded service that benefits many older citizens.

We at COVE are concerned that, if Gov. Scott vetoes the budget because of an unrelated issue, his action could threaten the health and welfare of older Vermonters across the state. A veto could either delay or reduce the important advances the FY 2018 budget makes. Consequently, we hope that the governor can see fit to allow this budget to move forward and work on other priorities through a different mechanism, one that won’t have such potentially dramatic negative impacts on older Vermonters.

Gini Milkey

Montpelier
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet


Comment Policy

In an effort to promote reasoned discussion, transparency, and integrity in online commenting, The Deerfield Valley News requires anyone posting comments to identify themselves using their real name. Anonymous commenting will not be allowed. All comments will be subject to approval before posting, and may take up to 24 hours for approval to be granted.

We encourage civil discourse among readers, and ask that they be willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. No personal harassment or hate speech will be tolerated. Please be succinct and to the point. For longer comments, please consider submitting a letter to the editor instead. It will appear in both the print and online editions.

All comments will be reviewed, and we reserve the right to reject, edit or remove any comment for any reason. For questions or to express concerns feel free to contact our office at (802) 464-3388.